Television is - and has always been - a Weapon of Mass Distraction.
The power of TV-imagery was the driving force behind the 9/11 deception.
Whenever a major news event is reported by the mainstream media,
it will invariably be illustrated with photographs or videos in order to
convey to the public some visual impressions of the event. Undeniably, the
imagery connected with any given news story enhances our emotional relation to it.
The way we relate to news imagery has an almost hypnotic effect on our psyche:
we have come to consider the visuals of any given news story as proof of that
news story’s authenticity. This is truly a ‘weak spot’ of our brains’ readiness for
critical-thinking. Thus follows, unfortunately, that to challenge the authenticity of a catastrophic
event shown on Live TV is way beyond what most people are willing to contemplate. However, the time has come for everyone to call television by its most appropriate, military-sounding name: "Weapon of Mass Distraction".
The 9/11 psyop relied foremostly on that ‘weak spot’ of ours. We all fell for the images
we saw on TV at the time – understandably so, as the sheer horror of the proposed
imagery generated a wall of outrage and fear – thick enough to discourage any critical
review of it. In hindsight, we can only wonder why so few questioned the absurd TV
coverage proposed by all the major networks. The picture at left shows a moment (at 8:59AM)
of the four synchronized TV broadcasts of ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX: yet another indication that
the 9/11 TV "LIVE" broadcasts were managed by one single, centralized studio.
(see my audio analysis in September Clues E)
WHAT TELEVISION VIEWERS SAW ON 9/11
The 9/11 TV imagery (of the crucial morning events) was just a computer-animated, pre-fabricated movie. It featured for the most part what were meant to be “chopper shots” of the
smoking towers - and very little else. The sum total of “Action Shots” (“Planecrash”
and “Tower collapses”) amounted to little over 30secs of the entire morning's TV broadcasts !
Needless to say, much as the rest of the animation movie, none of these “Action Shots” depicted any sort of reality. Now, it may be difficult for many to understand why the 9/11 plotters needed to fake even the tower collapses; yet this was undoubtedly the most crucial aspect of the entire operation - and needs to be fully understood in its plain logic: The unprecedented WTC demolition job was far too risky an affair to be shown on LIVE TV - (or to let any amateur cameraman capture it on film). The 9/11 conspirators had no intention whatsoever to offer such a "pyrotechnical" spectacle to world scrutiny - just imagine how unspeakably foolish this would have been. Thus, in all probability, the oldest trick in the manuals of covert military ops was used: smokescreens. More recent technology deactivated temporarily all cameras within sight of the area. In reality, the towers were most likely enveloped in thick smoke (military obscurants) as they collapsed - and no real footage exists of that brief event. Thankfully - for all normal people of this world - the 9/11 planners hired a poorly skilled animation crew : in their efforts to simulate reality, their crass 'artistry' and countless mistakes provide ample and repeatable proof of the trickery - forever engraved in the TV archives.
These images are an intolerable insult to human intelligence :
A REAL PLANE CRASH ?___________________________A REAL SKYSCRAPER COLLAPSE ?
WHY FAKE THE NEWS BROADCASTS ? The 9/11 TV broadcasts were designed to ‘sell’ a fictitious terror attack to the world– by replacing the real-life events of the day (the WTC demolitions) with fake imagery. The official story was quite surreal - as were the TV images of the day and the preposterous tale of 19 kids roundly outfoxing the US Air Defense.
It is essential to judge with one's own eyes the broadcasts actually aired by
ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC and CNN.
WHAT ABOUT THE "AMATEUR" VIDEOS ? All the other videos (endlessly replayed on TV) were released only later. They have all been extensively analyzed by scores of video analysts; each and every video snippet of "amateur imagery" has been methodically dissected and compared - and empirically proved
to be nothing else than computer-generated fabrications.
BUT REAL PEOPLE ARE TIED TO THIS STORY ! Unfortunately, yes. In all likelihood, those involved deeply enough are coerced into maintaining a position that has been scripted for them. For now, we can assume nobody is comfortable being the first whistle blower about the operation because they would be alone against a globalist empire that controls the people's only source of information about its activities: the media. Would you be the first to speak out against such a monolithic force? It's one thing to be an independent investigator like ourselves. It is entirely another to break a "gag order" contract with the U.S. government. As for what to do if you know or suspect someone is in trouble because of the events of 9/11, you lost a loved one or know someone who did during that time, please see our advice in the F.A.Q.
HOW WERE PRIVATE VIDEOS IMPEDED ? In order for the 9/11 TV-deception to succeed,
full visual control
of the Manhattan area had to be in place. The existence of EMP/HERF technology is
undisputable: only the hypothesis of it being used on 9/11 remains unverifiable. It is,
however, a reasonable postulation supported by a series of electronic blackouts which
occurred in NYC that morning. In any event, the logic of using EMP/HERF holds water and
effectively explains the ruse with disarming simplicity: NO private photography of
the real-life events was allowed: thus, the imagery aired by the TV
networks feared no comparison and was passed off as reality.